The ProLife society model is a radical and ambitious vision, fundamentally reshaping human interaction with each other and the planet, deeply aligned with its stated goal of supporting all life on Earth. Its core tenets — a shift to vegetarianism, symbiotic animal relations, complete elimination of pesticides, and an incredibly high 98% resource reduction and regeneration via high-tech and AI — demonstrate a profound commitment to ecological stewardship and sustainable living. This society endeavors to transcend traditional economic growth models, prioritizing long-term planetary health and universal well-being. The vision's extension to 'first in earth, then in space' indicates a future-oriented, expansive mindset, suggesting a model that could eventually be replicated beyond Earth, driven by its core principles of life support and ethical progress. The custom elements, particularly the universal basic income covering needs below a certain threshold and the explicit right to decide on societal contribution, fundamentally alter the relationship between work, individual freedom, and communal responsibility. This creates a safety net that could significantly reduce poverty and stress, allowing individuals to pursue passions or focus on critical innovation without the immediate pressure of survival.

Economically, the circular economy, coupled with the astounding 98% resource reduction and regeneration, promises unprecedented long-term prosperity and resilience. This model fundamentally decouples societal well-being from resource depletion, creating a virtually self-sustaining system. High-tech and AI are not merely tools for convenience but are integral to achieving these ambitious ecological goals. The custom element where 'work for money starts above a certain level' effectively nationalizes basic necessities, freeing up individual human potential for voluntary contribution, innovation, or leisure, with the caveat that significant wealth accumulation requires effort beyond the basic provision. This framework incentivizes work that genuinely contributes to progress and innovation, as it's explicitly welcomed and supported, rather than work simply for survival. Participation in societal life being honored further reinforces civic engagement, which is crucial for a direct democracy model.

However, the governance and social structures present significant challenges. Direct democracy, while empowering, can lead to decision fatigue, slow policy implementation, and susceptibility to populist swings. Citizen rotation in leadership, while fostering broader participation, risks a lack of experienced, long-term leadership and strategic continuity, potentially undermining the complex ecological and technological initiatives. The meritocracy social structure, while promoting achievement, could create social stratification or resentment between those who 'contribute' above the basic level and those who choose not to, even with the universal basic income. The fundamental 'right to live as they want as long as their individual way of life doesn't challenge other citizen's lives' is a noble ideal but can be a significant source of conflict in practice. Defining 'challenge' objectively and resolving disputes without infringing on individual liberty will be a persistent challenge for the Transparent Digital Courts and Rights-Based Neutral Police. While the society aims for high social cohesion through shared values and basic provision, these inherent structural tensions could test its unity over time, requiring robust mechanisms for conflict resolution and fostering a culture of mutual respect and understanding that goes beyond legal enforcement.