You’re viewing a society designed by a cherished community user.
Inspired? You’re warmly invited to model and evaluate your own society next.
Future Outlook for:
"Sharktis"
SOCIETY VISION STATEMENT:
Sharktis is a society of artificial islands.
A. It consists of of independent, resilient and self-determined communities.
B. They are flexible, have totally different sizes, rules, values, laws, regulations and ways of lives,
floating in dissimilar directions and goals on the global oceans (or are installed fix as fix docking points).
C. All of them agree just on 3 binding, obligatory elements:
1. the same solid, unbreakable underground and architecture, which allows a frictionless docking and absolute compatibility, to become an unbreakable unit, which is required in cases of climatic changes, challenges, uncertaincies or dangers.
2. while combined, all of them accept a fix charta of rights and duties as common regulation, binding for all units and all of their citizens, to coexist and survive during these periods, when cooperation and same laws, rights and duties are necessary or vital. These regulations are now defined on byos.one.
3. life on the ocean, for all citizens, needs to be shaped in a healthy and sustainable way in balance with nature, without pollution and over-exploitation, with all forms of energy supply and cultivation on the surface, in the water and on the global ocean grounds.
Figuratively speaking, like a flexible, light version of Leviathan, originally made by Hobbes:
Lots of small units, unifying only for short time and then spreading, floating around the world as they want.
Sharktis can be modified and utilized one day in higher orbits of earth and in space.
Your Society Blueprint
Governance Model
Direct democracy
Leadership and Rotation
Elected leadership
Legal and Justice System
Democratic rule of law
Rights and Responsibilities
Progressive rights
Internal Security and Policing
Rights-based neutral police
Defense and Military Structure
Citizen military
Economic Model
Circular economy
Technology and Innovation
Human-AI collaboration
Education and Knowledge
AI-personalized education
Social Structure and Inclusion
Civic equality
Global Relations and Cosmic Outlook
Peace-building first
Custom Elements
All societal elements are only valid, while the various units of Sharktis are unified. Obligatoty elections, to see, who is willing and able to take on any task or leadership. During these periods transparence and responsibility of leadership are mandatory. Each month leadership is replaced, "primus inter pares". Lead by example is the main feature of coexistance and cooperation in Sharktis. All only, while unified. When challenging times are over, all units spread and live where and how they want.
What's Next? Generate a Transformation Masterplan!
Take your societal blueprint to the next level. Select a real-world country to see a strategic, AI-generated masterplan for transforming it into the society you just designed.
Overall Stability
Stable and resilient when unified due to strong foundational agreements and structures, but the constant flux of disaggregation and re-aggregation inherently reduces long-term overall stability for the 'society' as a whole, favoring local unit stability over a consistent collective one.
Equality Index
High when unified due to explicitly progressive rights, civic equality, democratic principles, and a common charter. Disparities among separated units are a factor, but the common charter provides a high baseline for significant periods.
Prosperity Potential
Circular economy, human-AI collaboration, and personalized education suggest high productivity and sustainable growth. The temporary nature of unification might limit some large-scale economic ventures but fosters varied, innovative local economies.
Innovation Capacity
Human-AI collaboration and AI-personalized education are top-tier drivers. The decentralized, diverse nature of individual islands acts as a massive parallel processing system for societal and technological experimentation, leading to incredibly high innovation.
Sustainability Score
Sustainability is a foundational, non-negotiable principle embedded in the vision and reinforced by the circular economy, demonstrating a deep commitment to environmental balance across all units and states.
Social Cohesion
While internal cohesion within a unified cluster would be strong due to shared governance and values, the fundamental design promotes independence and diversity over continuous collective identity, resulting in situational rather than constant cohesion for the 'Sharktis' entity.
Key Strengths
- Extreme Adaptability and Resilience: The modular design allows rapid response to global or local crises by unifying, then dispersing, making it highly flexible and robust.
- Unparalleled Innovation Capacity: Decentralized experimentation among diverse units, combined with Human-AI collaboration and AI-personalized education, fosters continuous and rapid technological and societal advancement.
- Fundamental Sustainability Commitment: Sustainability is a core, universally binding principle for all citizens, reinforced by a circular economy and explicit ecological balance.
- High Individual Freedom and Autonomy: Communities maintain significant self-determination and varied ways of life when separated, promoting diversity and localized governance.
- Effective Crisis Response: The ability to form a unified, structured entity with shared governance, defense, and resources allows for powerful collective action during emergencies.
Potential Challenges
- Inherent Collective Instability: The lack of continuous collective identity or governance makes long-term strategic planning, trust-building, and consistent policy execution challenging.
- Significant Coordination Overhead: Frequent re-aggregation, monthly leadership changes, and re-elections could lead to high administrative burden, inefficiency, and a lack of institutional memory.
- Potential for Disparity and Conflict: Extreme diversity in laws, values, and development among units in their disunified state could lead to friction, philosophical clashes, or unequal resource distribution when not bound by the common charter.
- Security Vulnerabilities when Dispersed: The absence of a permanent collective defense mechanism or internal security beyond individual units when separated could leave islands vulnerable.
- Ambiguity in Unification Triggers: Defining precisely what constitutes 'challenging times' requiring unification could be a significant point of contention, potentially leading to delayed or insufficient collective responses.

Go Beyond the Simulation
Explore → our in-depth VOICES & VISIONS blog, participate in more than +30 SHAPE SOCIETY surveys, discover MODELS THAT INSPIRE from around the world, a fundamental SOCIETY WIKI and international NETWORKS FOR CHANGE.
Visit BYOS.ONEDetailed Analysis
Sharktis presents a fascinating and highly adaptive societal model, defined by its core principle of temporary unification for collective survival and its strong emphasis on individual community autonomy. The vision of a 'flexible, light version of Leviathan' perfectly encapsulates its dynamic nature: independent, self-determined communities that can seamlessly dock, unify under a common charter, and leverage shared governance and resources during times of crisis, only to disperse once the immediate threat subsides. This model is fundamentally designed for resilience in the face of external challenges, particularly environmental ones, given its oceanic setting.
During periods of unification, the selected modules create a robust and highly functional collective. Direct democracy, combined with elected and monthly rotating 'primus inter pares' leadership, ensures broad participation, accountability, and prevents the entrenchment of power, strongly supported by the custom elements of obligatory elections and mandatory transparency. The 'Democratic rule of law' and 'Progressive rights', enforced by a 'Rights-based neutral police' and defended by a 'Citizen military', establish a fair, secure, and egalitarian environment for all citizens within the unified structure. The 'Circular economy' and 'Human-AI collaboration' point to an advanced, sustainable, and highly productive economic engine, further enhanced by 'AI-personalized education' to foster continuous learning and innovation. The 'Peace-building first' approach to external relations suggests a non-aggressive, cooperative stance even in a unified state. However, the transient nature of these structured periods means that while the society can be incredibly effective when unified, it constantly faces the challenge of rebuilding collective trust and coordination mechanisms, and potentially re-aligning diverse internal rules, each time it reunifies.
The genius of Sharktis lies in its embrace of diversity and individual self-determination when units are separated, allowing for a vast range of social, cultural, and technological experimentation. This extreme flexibility is a double-edged sword: it is a potent driver of innovation and adaptability, but it also means that a continuous, overarching 'Sharktis' collective identity or sustained common purpose beyond crisis response is unlikely to form. While the custom elements explicitly state that 'all societal elements are only valid while the various units of Sharktis are unified,' the third binding element of the vision – a commitment to a 'healthy and sustainable way in balance with nature' – transcends unification. This universal commitment to sustainability acts as a crucial, non-negotiable ethical baseline, guiding the behavior of all communities even in their independent states. The potential for Sharktis to operate in higher orbits or space highlights its fundamental adaptability and the strength of its modular design.
Challenges for Sharktis primarily stem from its inherent impermanence. The constant flux between unification and disunification, coupled with monthly leadership changes, could lead to significant coordination overhead and a lack of long-term institutional memory for collective projects not tied to immediate crises. The definition of 'challenging times' necessitating unification could become a point of contention, potentially leading to delayed or insufficient responses if units disagree on the severity or immediacy of a threat. Furthermore, while individual units enjoy high autonomy, the extreme divergence in laws, values, and ways of life during separation could create significant social and ethical chasms, making effective reintegration and adherence to the common charter more difficult over extended periods. The system relies heavily on the willingness of independent units to set aside their differences and unify, which is a significant social and political hurdle, even with the explicit architectural compatibility. Trust, transparency, and a shared understanding of collective existential threats will be paramount to its long-term success.